carrito
0

email

Contraseña

Recordar contraseña
datos de acceso



La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?

Revistas Teoria Politica Teoria Politica 2015 La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?

La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?

La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?

Acceso a los documentos

tick
Floridia, Antonio - La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?
ebook
Digital
2.00€
icon_info
Cerrar

La democrazia deliberativa e i partiti: un incontro impossibile?

Características del artículo

Descripción
In the theoretical debate on deliberative democracy, the subject of parties seems totally absent or, when it is evoked, this happens only in a negative sense. In general, it is believed that the same spread of new participatory and deliberative models is a symptom or an effect of the crisis of representative democracy and the traditional role of parties. Deliberative democracy, thus, is often presented as an ideal of democracy whose own assumptions make it suspicious of the very idea of «party» and hostile to partisanship. This essay will demonstrate that this view of deliberative democracy, despite being the prevailing one, is not the only possible one. The goal of this paper, therefore, is twofold. First, we try to come to an understanding of the theoretical roots of those positions which have lead a part of deliberative democratic theory to enact a kind of normative devaluation of parties. Second, we challenge this conclusion, and even establish some points that will allow us to better identify the role of parties, and above all a renewed role of political parties, while still following a deliberative conception of democracy. To this end, we will first indicate the reasons that led to a substantial eclipse of this theme in the development of mainstream deliberative democracy, and we will refer to some of the founding texts of deliberative democracy, in particular, the first works of Bernard Manin and Joshua Cohen, where the theme of the party was indeed present. Subsequently, we will analyze the first attempts that laid the theoretical foundations of a possible reconsideration of this issue, and we will present some more recent theoretical developments (i.e. a «systemic approach» to deliberative democracy) that, in our opinion, will allow us to break the silence on this front. Thereupon, we will inquire into what the parties were, with respect to what they are today, in the light of the deliberative theoretical paradigm and the analysis proposed by political scientists. Finally, we will propose some stimuli to foster further reflection on normative issues, looking in particular at the dual role of parties as deliberative agents and as deliberative spaces. In essence, our goal is to refute a widespread belief that a deliberative conception of democracy has little to say about parties.
Palabras clave
Deliberative Democracy. Representative Democracy. Party Theory. Partisanship. Intra-party Democracy.
+
carrito

Ficha técnica



In the theoretical debate on deliberative democracy, the subject of parties seems totally absent or, when it is evoked, this happens only in a negative sense. In general, it is believed that the same spread of new participatory and deliberative models is a symptom or an effect of the crisis of representative democracy and the traditional role of parties. Deliberative democracy, thus, is often presented as an ideal of democracy whose own assumptions make it suspicious of the very idea of «party» and hostile to partisanship. This essay will demonstrate that this view of deliberative democracy, despite being the prevailing one, is not the only possible one. The goal of this paper, therefore, is twofold. First, we try to come to an understanding of the theoretical roots of those positions which have lead a part of deliberative democratic theory to enact a kind of normative devaluation of parties. Second, we challenge this conclusion, and even establish some points that will allow us to better identify the role of parties, and above all a renewed role of political parties, while still following a deliberative conception of democracy. To this end, we will first indicate the reasons that led to a substantial eclipse of this theme in the development of mainstream deliberative democracy, and we will refer to some of the founding texts of deliberative democracy, in particular, the first works of Bernard Manin and Joshua Cohen, where the theme of the party was indeed present. Subsequently, we will analyze the first attempts that laid the theoretical foundations of a possible reconsideration of this issue, and we will present some more recent theoretical developments (i.e. a «systemic approach» to deliberative democracy) that, in our opinion, will allow us to break the silence on this front. Thereupon, we will inquire into what the parties were, with respect to what they are today, in the light of the deliberative theoretical paradigm and the analysis proposed by political scientists. Finally, we will propose some stimuli to foster further reflection on normative issues, looking in particular at the dual role of parties as deliberative agents and as deliberative spaces. In essence, our goal is to refute a widespread belief that a deliberative conception of democracy has little to say about parties.

Opiniones

No existen comentarios

Te puede interesar

Do More Opportunities for Participation Imply More Democracy? The Case of the German Pirate Party
Do More Opportunities for Participation Imply More Democracy? The Case of the German Pirate Party
Hayek and Polanyi on Choice and Inevitability
Hayek and Polanyi on Choice and Inevitability
La questione sociale, oggi
La questione sociale, oggi
Democrazia deliberativa: considerazioni critiche
Democrazia deliberativa: considerazioni critiche
In questo numero. Nei prossimi numeri. Invito a contribuire
In questo numero. Nei prossimi numeri. Invito a contribuire
Tecniche di democrazia naturale. Pedagogia e politica in Rousseau e Tocqueville
Tecniche di democrazia naturale. Pedagogia e politica in Rousseau e Tocqueville
11 settembre 2001. Dal mito alla storia
11 settembre 2001. Dal mito alla storia
Il legislatore, il governante, il giudice: tre figure del potere
Il legislatore, il governante, il giudice: tre figure del potere
Uno, nessuno o centomila? Riflessioni su Augusto nel bimillenario della morte (14 – 2014)
Uno, nessuno o centomila? Riflessioni su Augusto nel bimillenario della morte (14 – 2014)
Selección editorial
Selección editorial

La inclusión de obras en la Biblioteca de Cultura Jurídica no se rige por un criterio de cantidad, sino de calidad.


Acceder
Ayuda
Ayuda

En esta sección se ofrece información útil relativa al visor on-line y sus funciones.


Acceder
Clientes institucionales
Clientes institucionales

Queremos satisfacer las demandas de los clientes que necesitan licencias de acceso colectivo.


Acceder
Gabinete de comunicación
Gabinete de comunicación

Tenemos una oferta de servicios de calidad para las corporaciones que deseen realizar acciones de RRPP desde la especialidad jurídica.


Acceder